@article{10.18756/edn.111.96,
	title = {{Reflections on Temperature-Warmth Course Lecture III}},
	shorttitle = {{Reflections on Temperature-Warmth Course Lecture III}},
	author = {Ruarus, Diederic},
	journal = {Elemente der Naturwissenschaft},
	year = {2019},
	volume = {111},
	pages = {96--98},
	url = {https://dx.doi.org/10.18756/edn.111.96},
	doi = {10.18756/edn.111.96},
	issn = {p-ISSN 0422-9630},
	language = {en},
	abstract = {<div>
<div>
<div>
<p><em>1. Introduction </em></p>

<p>A small group in Christchurch, New Zealand, has been studying the Warmth course1. Two members of the group, of which I was one, realised that Steiner{'}s treatment of temperature lacks clarity and homogeneity. Both of us have a scientific training (i.e. mathematics and chemistry/physics) and are reasonably aware of the conventional view of temperature as a number. Incidently, we both realised that in previous readings of these lectures, we hadn{'}t noticed this very unconventional treatment of temperature. And the glaring contradiction in lecture 3.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
},
	annote = {<div>
<div>
<div>
<p><em>1. Introduction </em></p>

<p>A small group in Christchurch, New Zealand, has been studying the Warmth course1. Two members of the group, of which I was one, realised that Steiner{'}s treatment of temperature lacks clarity and homogeneity. Both of us have a scientific training (i.e. mathematics and chemistry/physics) and are reasonably aware of the conventional view of temperature as a number. Incidently, we both realised that in previous readings of these lectures, we hadn{'}t noticed this very unconventional treatment of temperature. And the glaring contradiction in lecture 3.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
}
}