TY - JOUR T1 - Reflections on Temperature-Warmth Course Lecture III A1 - Ruarus, Diederic JA - Elem. d. Naturw. JF - Elemente der Naturwissenschaft PY - 2019 VL - 111 SP - 96 EP - 98 DO - 10.18756/edn.111.96 SN - p-ISSN 0422-9630 LA - en N2 -
1. Introduction
A small group in Christchurch, New Zealand, has been studying the Warmth course1. Two members of the group, of which I was one, realised that Steiner’s treatment of temperature lacks clarity and homogeneity. Both of us have a scientific training (i.e. mathematics and chemistry/physics) and are reasonably aware of the conventional view of temperature as a number. Incidently, we both realised that in previous readings of these lectures, we hadn’t noticed this very unconventional treatment of temperature. And the glaring contradiction in lecture 3.
1. Introduction
A small group in Christchurch, New Zealand, has been studying the Warmth course1. Two members of the group, of which I was one, realised that Steiner’s treatment of temperature lacks clarity and homogeneity. Both of us have a scientific training (i.e. mathematics and chemistry/physics) and are reasonably aware of the conventional view of temperature as a number. Incidently, we both realised that in previous readings of these lectures, we hadn’t noticed this very unconventional treatment of temperature. And the glaring contradiction in lecture 3.
1. Introduction
A small group in Christchurch, New Zealand, has been studying the Warmth course1. Two members of the group, of which I was one, realised that Steiner’s treatment of temperature lacks clarity and homogeneity. Both of us have a scientific training (i.e. mathematics and chemistry/physics) and are reasonably aware of the conventional view of temperature as a number. Incidently, we both realised that in previous readings of these lectures, we hadn’t noticed this very unconventional treatment of temperature. And the glaring contradiction in lecture 3.