@article{10.18756/edn.85.111, title = {{Computerised texture image analysis of biocrystallisation images}}, shorttitle = {{Computerised texture image analysis of biocrystallisation images}}, author = {Andersen, Jens-Otto}, journal = {Elemente der Naturwissenschaft}, year = {2006}, volume = {85}, pages = {111--111}, url = {https://dx.doi.org/10.18756/edn.85.111}, doi = {10.18756/edn.85.111}, issn = {p-ISSN 0422-9630}, language = {en}, abstract = {

The five main conclusions of my investigations were:

1) So far several studies using computerised image analysis have been published, which were able to discriminate in a relevant manner between specific samples.

2) The approaches can be divided into textural and more structural approaches.

3) In some studies results were improved when introducing more structural elements into a textural approach.

4) Due to the structural character of a biocrystallisation picture we may expect that ultimately a structural approach will be most succesful.

5) We may not expect that image analysis will be able to reflect the {`}Gestalt{'} level of the samples, and is only a helpful tool in combination with visual evaluation.
{\&}nbsp;

}, annote = {

The five main conclusions of my investigations were:

1) So far several studies using computerised image analysis have been published, which were able to discriminate in a relevant manner between specific samples.

2) The approaches can be divided into textural and more structural approaches.

3) In some studies results were improved when introducing more structural elements into a textural approach.

4) Due to the structural character of a biocrystallisation picture we may expect that ultimately a structural approach will be most succesful.

5) We may not expect that image analysis will be able to reflect the {`}Gestalt{'} level of the samples, and is only a helpful tool in combination with visual evaluation.
{\&}nbsp;

} }