@article{10.18756/edn.73.75, title = {{Materialism is NOT a Mechanistic World View}}, shorttitle = {{Materialism is NOT a Mechanistic World View}}, author = {Cruse, Don}, journal = {Elemente der Naturwissenschaft}, year = {2000}, volume = {73}, pages = {75--80}, url = {https://dx.doi.org/10.18756/edn.73.75}, doi = {10.18756/edn.73.75}, issn = {p-ISSN 0422-9630}, language = {en}, abstract = {
{\guillemotleft}The machine image objectivizes at a stroke whatever it touches by emphasizing its inherent otherness from man, its non-communicability. In the magical world-view of the Old Gnosis, all things - animal, plant, mineral - radiate meanings; they are intelligible beings - or the natural faces such beings put on for us in the physical world. But for Newton, the celestial spheres comprise a machine; for Descartes animals become machines; for Hobbes, society is a machine; for La Mettrie, the human body is a machine; eventually for Pavlov and Watson, human behaviour is machine like. So steadily, the natural world dies as it hardens into mechanistic imagery.{\guillemotright} [...]
{\&}nbsp;
{\guillemotleft}The machine image objectivizes at a stroke whatever it touches by emphasizing its inherent otherness from man, its non-communicability. In the magical world-view of the Old Gnosis, all things - animal, plant, mineral - radiate meanings; they are intelligible beings - or the natural faces such beings put on for us in the physical world. But for Newton, the celestial spheres comprise a machine; for Descartes animals become machines; for Hobbes, society is a machine; for La Mettrie, the human body is a machine; eventually for Pavlov and Watson, human behaviour is machine like. So steadily, the natural world dies as it hardens into mechanistic imagery.{\guillemotright} [...]
{\&}nbsp;