@article{10.18756/edn.75.84,
	title = {{Evolution durch Retention?}},
	shorttitle = {{Evolution durch Retention?}},
	author = {Schilperoord, Peer},
	journal = {Elemente der Naturwissenschaft},
	year = {2001},
	volume = {75},
	pages = {84--88},
	url = {https://dx.doi.org/10.18756/edn.75.84},
	doi = {10.18756/edn.75.84},
	issn = {p-ISSN 0422-9630},
	language = {en},
	abstract = {<p>Are heterochrony and retention driving forces in the macroevolution of plants? The arguments of Wolfgang Schad in his article {\guillemotleft}Evolution durch Retention - Zur Makroevolution der ersten Landpflanzen, der h{\"o}heren Tiere und des Menschen{\guillemotright} in {\guillemotleft}Goethes Beitrag zur Erneuerung der Naturwissenschaften{\guillemotright}, edited by Peter Heusser, are not convincing. The example of Anewophyton germanicnm, a treelike progymnosperm, and the example of the evolution of the leaf are discussed.</p>

<p>Both examples are not suitable to prove the hypothesis of heterochrony and retention as driving forces of plant evolution.<br />
{\&}nbsp;</p>
},
	annote = {<p>Are heterochrony and retention driving forces in the macroevolution of plants? The arguments of Wolfgang Schad in his article {\guillemotleft}Evolution durch Retention - Zur Makroevolution der ersten Landpflanzen, der h{\"o}heren Tiere und des Menschen{\guillemotright} in {\guillemotleft}Goethes Beitrag zur Erneuerung der Naturwissenschaften{\guillemotright}, edited by Peter Heusser, are not convincing. The example of Anewophyton germanicnm, a treelike progymnosperm, and the example of the evolution of the leaf are discussed.</p>

<p>Both examples are not suitable to prove the hypothesis of heterochrony and retention as driving forces of plant evolution.<br />
{\&}nbsp;</p>
}
}