Wie läßt sich das Weltbild ändern?

Vortrag am Rundtischgespräch zum Thema Gentechnik vom 7. bis 9. Oktober 1994 im Goetheanum Dornach
Elemente der Naturwissenschaft 62, 1995, P. 1-8 | DOI: 10.18756/edn.62.1


The question is how to bring movement into the old way of thinking, into that mechanistic worldview underlying the overexploitation of nature. My claim is that a worldview cannot be transformed simply by understanding the penury of the old and by proclaiming another, better (= more inclusive, more respectful etc.) one. We rather have to understand the practical processes constructing a worldview, i.e. the processes that model the things the way we are seeing them all the time. Perception (in a full sense) and interpretation are actions taking place within relationships and are therefore normatively shaped. This leads to an inversion of perspective: Not a metaphysical theory is underlying our practical attitudes to nature but metaphysics itself has its roots in a practical framework. What we can learn is to regain sense in discovering a fuller praxis.

  • Jonas, Hans (1973): Organismus und Freiheit, Ansätze zu einer philosophischen Biologie, Göttingen.
  • Jonas, Hans (1979): Das Prinzip Verantwortung, Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation, Frankfurt aM.
  • Naess, Arne (1989): Ecology, Community and Lifestyle, Cambridge.
  • Rehmann—Sutter, Christoph (1994): Leben beschreiben. Über Handlungszusammenhänge in der Biologie, Diss. Darmstadt (Publikation in Vorbereitung: Königshausen & Neumann, Tübin gen).