Articles

Science as process or dogma? The case of the peppered moth

Craig Holdrege
Elemente der Naturwissenschaft 70, 1999, P. 39-51 | DOI: 10.18756/edn.70.39
Article | Language: English | €6.00
Export Article Citation as

Abstract:

The example of the Peppered Moth (Biston betularia) is widely viewed and presented as a clear proof of evolution through natural selection. A study of the primary literature reveals a much more complex picture of the phenomena and of the process of scientific investigation. This example can teach us to be critical of «scientific proofs» and help us to view science as a process of interaction between the observer and the observed. This has significant implications for science education.

References
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993): Benchmarks for science literacy. New York.
  • Berry R.]. (1990): Industrial melanism and peppered moths (Biston betularia (L.)) Biological journal of the Linnean Society 39, p. 301-322.
  • Bishop J. A. (1972): An experimental study of the cline of industrial melanism in Biston betularia (L.) (Lepidoptera) between urban Liverpool and rural North Wales. Journal of Animal Ecology 41, p. 209-243.
  • Clarke CA. et al. (1985): Evolution in reverse: clean air and the peppered moth. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 26, p. 189—199.
  • Creed ER. et al. (1980): Pre-adult vialbility differences of melanic Biston betularia (L.) (Lepidoptera). Biologicaljournal of the Linnean Society 13, p. 251—262.
  • Goethe ] W. von (1995): Scientific studies, volume 12 of collected works. Princeton, N].
  • Gould S.]. and Lewontin R.C. (1979): The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B205, p. 581—598.
  • Grant B.S. et al. (1996): Parallel rise and fall of melanic peppered moths in America and Britain. Journal of Heredity 87, p. 351—357.
  • Hardin G. (1966): Biology: its principles and implications. San Francisco.
  • Holdrege C. (1996): Genetics and the manipulation of life: the forgotten factor of context. Hudson, NY.
  • Holdrege C. (1998): The sloth: a study in wholeness. Newsletter of the Society for the Evolution of Science 14(1), p. 125.
  • Jones J.S. (1982): More to melanism than meets the eye. Nature 300, p. 109—110.
  • Kaesuk Yoon C. (1996): Parallel plots in classic evolution. New York Times Nov. 1, C1.
  • Kettlewell H.B.D. (1955): Selection experiments on industrial melanism in the Lepidoptera. Heredity 9, p. 323-342.
  • Kettlewell H.B.D. (1956): Further selection experiments on industrial melanism in the Lepidoptera. Heredity 10, 287-301.
  • Kettlewell H.B.D. (1959): Darwins missing evidence. In Evolution and the fossil record, readings from Scientific American, 1978, p. 28-33. San Francisco.
  • Kettlewell H.B.D. (1973): The evolution of melanism. Oxford.
  • Lambert D.M. et al. (1986): On the classic case of natural selection. Rivista di Biologia Biology Forum 79, p. 11-49.
  • Lees D.R. (1981): Industrial melanism: genetic adaptation of animals to air pollution. In. J. A. Bishop and LM. Cook (Eds.), Genetic consequences of man-made change, p. 129—176. London.
  • Lees D.R. and ER. Creed (1975): Industrial melanism in Biston betularia: the role of selective predation. Journal of Animal Ecology 44, p. 67-83.
  • Majerus M.E.N. (1998): Melanism: evolution in action. Oxford and New York.
  • Margulis L. and D. Sagan (1997): Slanted truths. New York.
  • Sargent TR. (1990): Industrial melanism in moths: a review and reassessment. In: Adaptive coloration in invertebrates (M. Wicksten, comp.)‚ pp. 17-30. Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
  • Sargent T.R. et al. (1998): The «classical» explanation of industrial melanism: assessing the evidence. In M.K. Hecht et al. Evolutionary Biology Volume 30, p. 299-322. New York.
  • Steiner R. (1988): The science of knowing. Spring Valley, NY.
  • Towle A. (1989): Modern biology. Austin.
  • Wells]. (1999): Second thoughts about peppered moths. The Scientist, May 24, p. 13.